s it possible for India to follow the Chinese model of growth and development?

印度有可能效仿中国的增长和发展模式吗？

以下是Quora网友的驳倒：

Kanthaswamy Balasubramaniam

Absolutely

India doesn't need to become a One Party Nation or a Nation for that

虽然了

印度并不需要变成一党国度

All India needs is

Drastic Legislation

Massive Base Education Program at Government Cost

Meritocracy and more Meritocracy

Failure Standards and Continuous evaluation in every arena

印度所需要的即是：

制订严厉的法律

政府为大边界的基础阐扬表情提供资金

精英政事以及更多的精英政事

为每个领域制订评估圭表，并进行执续评估

That's how China became what it is

So it couldn't have been Autocracy alone that steered Chinas massive growth. It should have been the above qualities

这即是中国得以取得顺利的步地

因此，我行我素毫不是中国经济高速增长的主要原因。中国的发展主若是以上几点的功劳。

Education and Meritocracy are Chinas biggest strength

Social Justice, Reservations and Cheap Politics are Indias biggest weaknesses

In China,being poor gets you nothing except a free schooling and a lunchtime meal and community tutions

In China, the richer and poorer students go to similar Public Schools with the same Syllabus

So you can't make excuses of poverty

China says “Too bad. If you don't have the merit , please go work at a farm”

阐扬和精英处分是中国最大的上风。

社会正义、预留制和无耻的政事地方皆是印度最大的弊端。

在中国，穷东谈主除了能取得免费阐扬、免费午餐和社区提示外什么皆得不到

在中国，富东谈主家和穷东谈主家的孩子上的皆是差未几的公立学校，教授大纲也雷同

是以你不不错贫苦为借口

中国说“真苦难。如果你莫得其他才调，那就去农场使命吧。”

Another biggest strength of the Chinese System is ACCOUNTABILITY and FAILURE STANDARDS

Any Problem and China will zero in on the culprit in minutes or days

Every Department has its own role to play

Every Ministry has its own Failure Standards and Performance standards and Promotions are based on these standards

中国体制的另一个最大上风是问责制和失败圭表。

非论是什么问题，中国皆不错在几分钟或几天内锁定罪魁罪魁。

每个部门皆有我方的变装职责

每个部门皆有我方的及格圭表和绩效圭表，并根据这些圭表进行提高。

Take Chinas 4.5% Growth for Q1 against the Target 3.9%.

Many Officials got rewarded, promoted

Had this been 3.2% Growth, then many officials wouldnt have got promoted for a long time

Every blunder in China has to be paid with

以中国第一季度4.5%的增长为例，当初的方针是3.9%。

许多官员得到了奖励和提高

如果增长率唯独3.2%，那么好多官员在很长一段时辰内皆无法得到提高

在中国，东谈主们要为我方犯下的每一个无理付出代价

India is the opposite

Zero Accountability, Zero failure Standards, Zero Goals for the Government and Excuses all the time

而印度偶合相背

莫得株连，莫得失败圭表，政府也莫得方针，随处随时找借口

So definitely yes

India must follow the Chinese basics and they can do so even without having to be a or an Autocracy

And of course China slogged hard for 45 years

India wants to sit down and expect magic ro happen. That attitude must also change

是以虽然不错

仅仅印度必须革职效仿中国的基本原则，他们不错作念到，不需要专制也不错

虽然了，中国也曾致力于慷慨了45年

印度只思坐等遗迹发生的这种作风也必须变嫌

JWG

India has a different political system and a different culture. These differences are not transplantable. Starting from 1990 China and India had the same GDP. The graph below shows there were sufficient opportunities for India to make adjustments. There is no evidence moving forward that India wants to change. The data trend suggest the divergence can widen.

印度有着和中国不同的政事轨制和文化。这些各异无法变嫌。1990年的时候，中国和印度的GDP如故雷同的。下图透露，印度也曾有弥散的契机作念出诊疗，但莫得凭据标明印度思过要变嫌。数据趋势标明，两国的各异可能会持续扩大。

Amit Jodha

There is not need to.

Indian society is way more chaotic, free and distinct from China, so it’s a fool’s errand to follow their modal, or anyone else’s for that matter.

Every country has some unique situations, it has to make best out of the given situations, it’s necessary to take note of how every country has grown, but to copy it entirely is stupid and will be unsuccessful.

莫得必要。

印度社会更参差，更目田，与中国不止天渊，是以效仿中国的模式是愚蠢的行径。

每个国度皆有各自的独到之处，必须充分尊重我方的情况，咱们照实要关注每个国度是如何发展的，但彻底复制其他国度是愚蠢的行径，不会顺利。

Let’s take a simple example, as it known, China is a manufacturing powerhouse, but the service industry is not nearly as strong as India’s. So, following the Chinese modal will essentially mean that we need to shut TCS and other service based countries down, while we need to bolster Manufacturing by imparting basic training to the untapped labor market potential of India.

But as you might have already deduced, that is a horrific idea, what about millions upon millions of Indian professionals in service sector, including me?

举个简略的例子，大家皆知，中国事制造业大国，但服务业远不如印度。因此，如果印度革职中国模式，施行上意味着咱们需要关闭塔塔扣问服务公司和其他服务业，同期还要为印度尚未得到拓荒的劳能源市集提供基础培训来复古制造业。

但正如你可能也曾揣度的那样，这是一个可怕的思法，包括我在内的数百万印度服务行业的专科东谈主士又该怎么办？

So, what we instead need to do is become the service powerhouse of the world, but at the same time work on the basics of manufacturing industry so that we can at least compete to some extent with China, or even if not compete, we can at least be self sufficient for most of our needs.

We should look forward to have out cities connected with high speed rail like China, so infrastructure should be a priority, but not the ghost towns of China. Indian government has set all cylinders ablaze to boost infrastructure in India, but at the same time, our heritage need to be respected.

因此，咱们印度需要作念的是成为全国服务强国，但同期致力于打造制造业的基础，这样咱们至少不错在一定历程上与中国张开竞争，或者就算无法和中国竞争，但咱们至少还不错收尾自食其力，焕发印度国内的大部分需求。

咱们应该期待印度的城市和中国雷同，通过高铁汇聚彼此谈判，是以基础要害成就应该是优先发展事项，而咱们不要效仿中国成就鬼城的作念法。印度政府也曾负重致远激动印度的基础要害成就，但与此同期，咱们也要尊重我方的传统。

India and China have historically been the two largest and richest civilizations, but that was never because they were trying to copy each other, but because they found the potential and power inside themselves to make best use of personalities of the people residing in those nations.

We need to get better than yesterday, and not care much about the growth and ways of China unless we can take lessons in particular topics, such as cleanliness, order and hard work.

印度和中国在历史上是两个最大、最奢靡的时髦，但从来皆不是因为他们之间彼此效仿，而是因为他们发现了我方内在的后劲和力量，最大松手地挖掘了居住在这些国度的寰球的才调。

咱们要比历史发展得更好，咱们不必太过宥恕中国的增长和发展步地，除非咱们不错鉴戒他们在某些问题上的履历，比如环境洁净、社会规律和发愤致力于。

Venkata Krishna

My answer is a straight No. India with its myriad of castes and subcastes and outcastes and gargantuan regional differences can never follow the China model.

我的谜底是狡赖的。印度有大皆的种姓、次种姓和贱民，并存在高大的地区各异，持久不可能效仿中国模式。

India's foundation prime minster was Pandit Nehru. He believed in gradualism, adoption of scientific method. The only way he could pull up the disadvantaged castes was through reservation. In spite of the best intentions of Nehru North India still suffers from extreme casteism. Therefore reservation for lower castes has to continue.

印度的建国总理是潘迪特·尼赫鲁。他信奉渐进倡导，采用科学的顺次。他唯独能拉拢劣势种姓的办法即是执行预留制。尽管尼赫鲁的本意是好的，但印度北部仍未解脱极点的种姓轨制。因此，对低种姓的预留轨制还必须持续看护下去。

Subramaniam Duraisamy

Yes, its perfectly possible for India to follow Chinese model for our growth and development. The catch is it has a big cost.

What is that big cost you may ask? Its the loss of 15 million human lives.

是的，印度彻底有可能效仿中国的增长和发展模式。问题在于这样作念的代价很大。

你可能会问，代价很大是什么理由？理由即是夺走了1500万东谈主的生命。

This is figures complied from Wikipedia but sourced from China’s own national statistics portal. So you cannot accuse me of using biased western sources.

这些数据来自维基百科，但源于中国我方的国度统计流派网站。是以你不要责骂我使用的是不公谈的西方数据着手。

In the 1960’s India was also a poor hungry country, and experienced two minor famines between 1964 and 1966. However we did not kill off our hungry poor and instead produced more food for the poor through scientific means. Ofcourse- KB Sir would call this “rabble appeasement”, but more rational people would call it human empathy.

20世纪60年代，印度亦然一个贫苦的饥饿国度，在1964年至1966年工夫印度经历了两次小边界的饥馑。但印度并莫得杀掉饥饿的穷东谈主，而是通过科学妙技为穷东谈主坐褥了更多的食品。虽然- KB Sir会把这种行径称为“乌合之众的绥靖”，但感性的东谈主会将其称为东谈主类的同理心。

Much of China’s demographic advantages comes from the fact that the government had draconian one child policies of the 80s. Call it luck or fate, this dividend combined with Deng’s opening of markets in the 80’s helped China.

中国的东谈主口上风主要来自于政府在80年代驱动执行了严厉的独生子女策略。非论是运道如故运道，这一红利加上在80年代灵通市集，对中国起到了匡助作用。

India on the other hand need not do any of the above. Our birth rates have been declining much more organically and steadily. We have now overtaken China as the most populous country and would continue to have a good growth till 2060 atleast.

但印度不需要这样作念。咱们的出身率一直在稳步下落。咱们目下也曾稀奇中国，成为全球东谈主口第一大国了，至少在2060年之前，咱们的东谈主口皆将持续保执精致的增长。

All this achieved without any major bloodshed or draconian reforms.

This combined with other factors would eventually help our growth organic manner. We need to bring in land, labor and retail reforms along with building our physical and social infrastructure, and its a matter of time

这一切皆是在莫得发生任何要紧流血事件或执行严厉创新的情况下收尾的。

再勾通其他身分，不错有助于咱们保执有机的增长。咱们需要引入地皮、劳能源和零卖创新，同期成就咱们的物资基础和社会基础结构，这即是一个时辰问题。

Alfred W Croucher

Is it wise for India to copy China's SEZ led growth model?

印度复制中国经济特区主导的增长模式是聪敏之举吗？

India must do what is best for India. I do not envy Modiji. Creating a modern economy in India just threatens the livelihood of so many people. Perhaps creating some model 'special zones' might have a salutary effect. Of course just throwing the country open to foreign trade and FDI before achieving some degree of modern efficiency would throw millions out of work and create chaos. But the Indian tendency to employ the most labour intensive methods will be difficult to overcome unless so many modern jobs can be created to absorb them.

印度必须作念对我方最故意的事情。我不退换莫迪。在印度打造当代经济，只会挟制到许多印度东谈主的糊口。也许创建一些圭表“特区”倒是能得到有益的遵循。

虽然，在收尾一定历程的当代遵循之前，让印度灵通对外生意和异邦径直投资，只会导致数百万东谈主休闲，并形成社会参差。

然而九游会·(j9)官方网站，印度东谈主采用工作密集型顺次的民俗很难克服，除非咱们大要创造出弥散多的当代使命岗亭来接管这些劳能源。